Andy Piper writes: > > Yes but it's too trivial to implement as something separate from > > Nick's JUCI. It should be included in it. > > I think this is a great idea! Did I miss the post about JUCI? I presume this > does some sort of reflected invocation scheme so that Emacs looks like a > Java class to the Java side and vice versa? >
Yep. I'm looking forward to seeing what Nick comes up with. Paul
