Note that my setup did not "replace" the version of Semantic, I just put
it in the load-path before other instances of Semantic (and I verified
that by inspecting the value after startup).  The User Guide
specifically says to REMOVE the older instances.  Is there any reason to
expect this might be my problem?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Kinnucan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 10:02 PM
> To: Karr, David
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Any way to customize where import generates the 
> import statement?
> 
> 
> Karr, David writes:
>  > I see now that the user guide just says it inserts at the 
> head of the  > buffer, but the code appears to be a little 
> more sophisticated, where it  > tries to figure out where it 
> should insert the import  > 
> (jde-import-get-import-insertion-point).  However, the result 
> is the  > same.  It just inserts the new import before the 
> package statement.  I  > guess I'll try a little debugging of 
> that function.
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> The import statements are supposed to be inserted AFTER the 
> package statement. That's how it's always worked for me and 
> how it worked when I just tested it by creating:
> 
> file Foo.java
> package jmath;
> 
> class Foo {
>  JButton button;
> }
> 
> and doing C-c C-v C-z with point on JButton. The result is
> 
> package jmath;
> 
> import javax.swing.JButton;
> 
> public class Foo {
>   JButton button;
> }
> 
> 
> I'm mystified that it works differently for you. Please send 
> a test case that I can use to reproduce the bug.
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
>  > 
>  > > -----Original Message-----
>  > > From: Karr, David 
>  > > 
>  > > Is there any way to customize where import statements are 
>  > > generated?  It presently inserts them at the head of the 
>  > > buffer, which means I still have to move them after they're 
>  > > generated.  I always put imports in a block with no blank 
>  > > lines, after the "package" statement, with a blank line 
>  > > before and after the block.  I see there are options for 
>  > > specifying how imports are grouped, but I assume that's 
>  > > separate from where they're initially inserted.
> 
> 

Reply via email to