--- Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <---snip---> > > Perhaps here is a problem with JabberSMTP being on JabberStudio. I > have > > not thought so until now, but if it is decided Jabberstudio is only > for > > free software (as in liberty) and open source projects, I will > certainly > > remove it from there, since it is not yet those things (but will be > soon). The license prohibits the copying of the code longer than 30 days, that prohibts it from cvs.
> I can't see why JS can't be a central place for Jabber projects of > varying > licenses. As long as they dont put everyone into a legal problem. >You are free to not use any particular code if you don't like the terms. Yes but the license covers the copying of it, not just the usage. >Or maybe do something constructive like rewriting it as a GPL > project rather than making comments about the age of the author. I dont mean it as an insult, I like Adam. Myself I am 26 :) > I agree that maybe the CVS might not be the best place for code that > is not > covered > under an "open" license (yet) My problem is that I dont want to be responsable for deleting it, the cvs repository is a contradiction in terms. They have a copy, they are in violation. You have to be a bit consistent as as license author! mike ===== James Michael DuPont http://introspector.sourceforge.net/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
