On Monday 06 February 2006 02:12, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
> Yes exactly, they should not claim this if they have some core parts
> unimplemented.

Let's turn this around then.  What version should a server claim if it does 
send stream <features/> in order to support SASL and STARTTLS but doesn't 
support privacy lists?

TX

-- 
             Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
         Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
          Web site: http://trypticon.org/
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73

Attachment: pgpKnrg68EL6N.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to