On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 12:23:38PM -0800, Justin Karneges wrote: > On Thursday 20 December 2007 2:52 pm, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > 2. Else, if the contact has no available resources, the server MUST > > either (1) reply to the presence probe by sending to the user the > > full XML of the last presence stanza of type "unavailable" > > received by the server from the contact, or (2) not reply at all. > > So a nice server will return the last unavailable presence information > > (with a Delayed Delivery flag), thus obviating the need for a flood of > > jabber:iq:last requests. > How about emphasizing the first option as a SHOULD? This would hopefully > encourage new servers to always reply, while not causing existing servers to > become non-compliant. On the other hand, usually just 1/3 of my roster is online. So if server starts sending presence for all contacts, initial "presence flood" from the server increases 3 times.
-- Maciek Niedzielski xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
