Fabio Forno wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The XSF has been accepted! :) > > Great ;) > >> > Just for asking if you think it makes sense or not: on the standards >> > ml we're discussing several mobile optimizations, and there is always >> > the doubt of the real figures behind the solution. What about if we >> > opened the source of the xmpp library upon which our client is based >> > on and, together with a connection manager (we have also that, already >> > opensource) we use a SoC project just for experimenting the solutions? >> > My only doubt is that perhaps it's too early for starting coding and >> > it's difficult to devise a project with controllable deliverables, the >> > only self contained project I've in mind could be a first >> > implementation of EXI >> >> That doesn't sound easy. :) > > In fact I was just brainstorming. A full EXI implementation on mobile > / connection manager would be a kill (in terms of work to do), however > if done just at the server side it could be feasible. EXI itself is > not so huge, it's just about looking up tokens in dictionaries and > doing some reordering, compression is done by standard zlib after all > the serialization. The main problem in xml streams is dynamic schema > synchronization, but in the the project we could set as minimum goal a > parser/serializer with fixed schemas and ASN.1 like encoding of > unknown namespaces as EXI already prescribes. > I think that such a library (in Java or C), with no client/server > integration, could be in the scope of SoC and it would be very useful > for both client and server developers in order to start experimenting > stream optimizations.
So this would merely be a library and would not be integrated into an existing client or server? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
