Am 11.03.2009 um 18:10 schrieb Dave Cridland:
No, you're signalling your availability to stpeter. That availability is allowed to be different to your general availability, this is true. And because of the interaction between directed presence and the roster, things can get complicated.
I could also send an unavailable and it would be the same problem.
I don't think that renders directed presence useless.
Well, imagine this situation: I send a presence with <show>dnd</show>. Then my client sets me auto away and later I return. So it sends a global available presence with no show. No peter seems me again. But I sent a directed presence because I wanted that he thinks I'm busy and doesn't bother me (sorry you have to be our example here, Peter ;)). But this is renderes useless by the global presence. IMO, a global presence should not replace a directed presence. At least not until you send a global unavailable presence or tell the server some other way that you don't want that directed presence anymore.
PS: No need to send to me directly and the list, I'm subscribed :). -- Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
