On 11/20/09 2:45 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> Has the e2e encryption / XTLS work advanced enough to do an e2e security >>> sprint around Fosdem? >> I think so. > > I have a reference implementation.
Excellent! > XEP-0189 key management needs some > more love by the pubsub versioning discussed on the pubsub list. Agreed. > BTW, I plan to update the XTLS draft soon with two changes: > > 1. Make SRP optional if we prefer the leap of faith Realistically I think that most people will prefer that, because they have no reason to think anything else is important (and they don't have another secure channel available anyway). > 2. Specify the username in the SRP handshake to be the initiators fullJID Why the full JID instead of the bare JID? Because the session is being set up between a full JID pair? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
