>> > not a bad idea :o) I agree that moderation is not needed. > > there's only one thing that has to be moderated/filtered out... > > the "out-of-office-autoreplies" when one posts to the list... > > can't be to difficult to accomplish, the subject line is nearly the same all the time ;o)
> That will have to be done by the users or intranet operators themselves - > these ooo-replies don't pass the JDJ-list server. hmpf... thanks for pointing my nose to it, of course the ooo-replies are sent to the address in the "from:" or "reply-to:" header respectively. it could be done by replacing the header with the list server's address and including the senders address somewhere in the body for direct contact to the sender. but thats evidently not the way this list server is working, so we'll have to live with it ;o) > ---- to all: --- > The already mentioned rating concept seems to have worked well for > web-based catalogues of (Java or Flash)[TM] online games. this is really a thing that shouldn be considered. > To reduce bouncing off-list discussions with the moderators: > Rejected eMails could be put onto a special JDJ hosted webpage for about a > week (sorted by subject). > The list gets a notification posting with the link(s) directly, every day > or even once a week only - or just an additional info-line in > Alan's more or less regular postings. and yet another praticable idea, you have my vote. greetings to all -- Werden Sie mit uns zum "OnlineStar 2002"! Jetzt GMX w�hlen - und tolle Preise absahnen! http://www.onlinestar.de ____________________________________________________ To change your JDJList options, please visit: http://www.sys-con.com/java/list.cfm Save Bandwidth! Clean up your posts before replying ____________________________________________________
