> I don't really understand the above. java_props_md.c must be compiled > separately for a 32-bit and 64-bit build. So in the 32-bit build ARCHPROP > should be set to i386, and in a 64-bit build it should be set to x86_64. > LIBARCH might be "universal" in both cases (is it?) but ARCHPROP should > reflect the actual value you want os.arch to report.
ARCHPROP set to universal activate dual build mode . ... /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/llvm-gcc -Os -x objective-c -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -W -Wall -Wno-unused -Wno-parentheses -arch i386 -arch x86_64 -D_LITTLE_ENDIAN -F/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Frameworks -F/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Frameworks -DJDK_MAJOR_VERSION='"1"' -DJDK_MINOR_VERSION='"7"' -DJDK_MICRO_VERSION='"0"' -DJDK_BUILD_NUMBER='"20120509"' -DNDEBUG -DARCH='"universal"' -Duniversal -D_ALLBSD_SOURCE -DRELEASE='"1.7.0-jdk7u6-b08"' -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -DMACOSX -I. -I/Users/henri/Documents/jenkins/data/jobs/openjdk-jdk7u-jdk7u/workspace/build/macosx-universal/tmp/java/java.lang/java/CClassHeaders -I../../../src/solaris/javavm/export -I../../../src/share/javavm/export -I../../../src/share/native/java/lang/fdlibm/include -I../../../src/share/native/java/io -I../../../src/solaris/native/java/io -I../../../src/solaris/native/java/util -I../../../src/share/native/common -I../../../src/solaris/native/common -I../../../src/share/native/java/lang -I../../../src/solaris/native/java/lang -DRELEASE='"1.7.0-jdk7u6-b08"' -DARCHPROPNAME='"universal"' -DALT_CODESET_KEY=_NL_CTYPE_CODESET_NAME -c -o /Users/henri/Documents/jenkins/data/jobs/openjdk-jdk7u-jdk7u/workspace/build/macosx-universal/tmp/java/java.lang/java/obj/java_props_md.o ../../../src/solaris/native/java/lang/java_props_md.c Dual build mode > Sorry if I'm misunderstanding the nuances of universal builds. 32 and 64bits build mode. See http://ngmarley.com/blog/osx-universal-binary/ (except PPC not related here). -arch x86_64 and -arch i386 added to compile / link time allow this dual build mode. >> Note, it was the way macosx-port did it before all universal support >> was removed in jdk7 branch ;( > > Yes, well the macosx port did a lot of things in ways that were less than > desirable. A little got fixed for 7, a little more for 8. Question remains, could we expect a 32/64 bits JVM from OpenJDK for OSX ?
