Hi Craig,
And we should probably disallow pmf == null in cases where there is
work to do.
I'm not sure. Do you mean that the test result is ERROR for test cases
having "pmf == null in cases where there is work to do"? Let me know
if you feel strong on this.
I think so. Since this is a new feature, any test case that uses
tearDown methods should leave the PMF open. Can you think of a case
where this is not true?
No. My question is: Do we want to *force* test cases to leave the PMF
open when they add tear down instances and/or classes?
Regards,
Michael
- Re: JDO-58 Michael Watzek
-