Halton: > This ???%description part is copied from README file in code base. Maybe I > need give a simple sentence: > %description > GOffice -- A glib/gtk set of document centric objects and utilities
This seems a better description. > I can not find any document talking about GOffice supported document > formats. I searched GOffice code base, I got lots MS support like: > * god-image.h: MS Office Graphic Object support I think you should ask the maintainers, or query on any public forums associated with this project. Would be good to encourage them to improve their documentation if it doesn't detail this information. Perhaps you could suggest adding such information to the README or something. >> Is goffice really a GPL library, as the License field in the >> goffice.spec file says? What is the impact of this? > >>From COPYING and REAMDE file, it is GPL licensed. But when I do > copyright-extractor for it, I found it is GPL/LGPL mixed. I'd raise this issue with the maintainers or on any public forum associated with the project. If the code is a mix of GPL and LGPL, then the effective license is GPL. However, it would be good to find out if the maintainers have any plans to switch to LGPL. If this is a GPL library, then we need to be careful and verify that we don't link it into any non-GPL programs. Do you have a complete list of all programs that are in Solaris that would use this library? What are their licenses? Brian
