On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 10:24 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote: > Halton: > > > Please help me to review spec files for goffice. SUNWlibgoffice.spec > > will go into spec-files-other/core. > > Maybe it's just me, but "There are common operations for document > centric applications that are conceptually simple, but complex to > implement fully." is a really awful description for goffice. At > any rate, I don't see the need to talk about the fact that they > are conceptually simple but difficult to implement". Are you trying > to say that this "library provides interfaces to perform common > operations on documents"? What kind of documents? This ???%description part is copied from README file in code base. Maybe I need give a simple sentence: %description GOffice -- A glib/gtk set of document centric objects and utilities
I can not find any document talking about GOffice supported document formats. I searched GOffice code base, I got lots MS support like: * god-image.h: MS Office Graphic Object support > Is goffice really a GPL library, as the License field in the > goffice.spec file says? What is the impact of this? >From COPYING and REAMDE file, it is GPL licensed. But when I do copyright-extractor for it, I found it is GPL/LGPL mixed. Then what should be in License filed? -Halton. > > Brian > > > > > >
