Jim: > Attached is spec file openproj and a workaround patch for openproj > doesn't works well in j2se 1.6.x. > > Please help me to review it.
> Summary: A free, open source desktop alternative to > Microsoft Project. I don't think it is a good idea to mention "Microsoft Project" by name. Can't we just describe the project in general terms, as a "Project management tool" or something? > A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing Again, can't we describe the project in general terms without mentioning "Microsoft Project"? > files with Microsoft Project and has very similar functionality > (Gantt, PERT diagram, histogram, charts, reports, detailed usage), as > well as tree views which aren't in MS Project. I'd say "it is compatible with other popular project tools" rather than mentioning "Microsoft Project" or "MS Project". Also, it seems that the description has the same text copied twice. I'd fix that. > # Requires(post): desktop-file-utils > # Requires(post): shared-mime-info > # Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils > # Requires(postun): shared-mime-info I'd remove commented lines. Brian
