Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 18:43 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > >> Patrick Ale wrote: >> >>> The svn diffs attached make '--without-apoc-adapter' the default for >>> building Firefox. >>> Reason is that for non-sun people in the community who compile from >>> specs the firefox package will always fail building by default. >>> >> Even if you build & install the recently open sourced APOC code first? >> >> http://apoc.freedesktop.org/ >> > > Well, > > http://apoc.freedesktop.org/wiki/Apoc/Downloads says: > Getting Apoc > Getting the source code > Release Tarballs > There are no tarball releases yet. > > As soon as there is a release tarball available, we can update our > APOC spec file and move it from the closed subdir. Right, Alberto? > I've made some work on the adapter to build it using the Mozilla/Firefox SDK so it doesn't need to be compiled with the whole source. Brian Lu is working on fixing the remaining problems. So we won't need to build it with firefox in the future. I don't know the consecuences on this Solaris-wise though.
Regarding the tarballs for the rest of the project, I'm not sure on how to proceed on this, I've made some changes on the code to allow the configure scripts to define locations and to be able to split the code. On the other hand, we haven't released all the previous code base, there are some parts that we're not going to release (the gui admin tool for the desktop agent as an example). If we're going to start doing releases from the open source tarballs, how are we going to keep shipping the non opensourced bits for nevada? Any ideas? > Laca > > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: alberto.ruiz.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 252 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/jds-review/attachments/20071218/049394b5/attachment.vcf>
