On 18/02/12 17:35, Benson Margulies wrote:
Why is there a pom in the top of the binary dist when there is nothing
in there that uses it? Did you mean to include a pom that builds the
examples?
Information. History. Removed.
A package name of tdb.examples (as opposed to org.apache.tdb.examples)
seems a bit unusual.
Historical; pre-dates Apache.
When we reorg the module structure, it has been suggested to have an
integrated examples module.
Source package:
conventional location for assembly descriptors is src/main/assembly.
Never understood that one. It's not part of the output so src/main
seems odd.
conventional location for log4j.properties would be src/xxx/resources
as appropriate.
That puts it into the jar file (subject to xxx).
Another discussion? it's picked up by commands from the current
directory if they want to override the default now-built-in settings,
e.g. development debugging.
why LICENSE and also LICENSE-dist (ditto NOTICE) and not in the binary package?
LICENSE goes into the jar, javadoc and source jar.
LICENSE-dist goes into the distribution and includes mention of included
dependent binaries. Isn't the the right thing to do?
None of this is a reason to respin from an editorial perspective.
+1
Thanks
Andy
