On 11 Oct 2011, at 11:32, nat lu wrote: > HI, > > Had a quick look - the patch seems to want to delete (in entirety) a couple > of existing SDB classes which I had made minimal modifications to, so I've > re-checked out SDB 1.3.4 and created a new patch which I can upload later. So > - the first attachment in Jira shouldnt be used.
Thanks for looking at this. I just tried applying this and it went a bit wrong. > Secondly, I haven't recreated all the unit test code that exists for other > RDBMS supported by SDB because, simply by the looks of it, there's quite a > bit of it, and I haven't had time so far. Urgh, that is horrible. > I've also, as I said before, not used Monet with any data yet, just got it to > the point that SDBConfig doesn't fall over, and the Jira issue raised is > simply to record the desire to support it (and perhaps other column stores if > conceptually they prove to have merit when used as an RDF repo). > > So, personally, I'd prefer (I assume you-all as well) that nothing happens > too quickly with this, until I or someone else gets some time to do some work > and produce the unit tests. The current tests, in part, run the graph tests over the store. That ought to be easier to get going. Will investigate. Damian
