On 02/04/12 20:00, Bill Roberts wrote:
Ah, sorry, misread your previous mail re stage 3 queries.
No, the number of queries at this point doesn't seem to make any difference, as
long as the PUT has finished.
Great - and I have a theory I need to test out.
(If it's a valid theory, this is the same root cause as Paul Gearon's
problems despite them looking different to me initially).
Andy
On 2 Apr 2012, at 19:37, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 02/04/12 19:33, Bill Roberts wrote:
Hi Andy
On 2 Apr 2012, at 14:23, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi Bill,
Sorry for the delay in replying. It was too sunny.
No problem! I am all for appreciating a bit of sunniness when the chance
presents itself.
Please add it to JIRA.
Will do.
There's nothing I can see that
(how much RAM?)
16 GB on the server for the problems that I reported last week. 2GB on my Mac
where this specific test was run (and a fair bit of that used by other
software).
big.ttl is the imd-2010-imd-score.ttl file?
I've tried it with a few different files (including that one) - same effect
with each.
Does it have to be 2 queries at stage 3? Does one have the same effect? None?
Just tested a bit more: with a single query during the PUT, it worked correctly
4 out of 5 times and failed once. With two queries during the PUT, the problem
occurred in all tests (tried about 10 times with 3 different 'big' files).
stage 3 is the queries after little the PUT - I'm guessing these make no
difference if little PUT has finished.
Andy
Thanks very much
Bill
