Great, sounds promising. Now in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-230
thanks On 2 Apr 2012, at 20:19, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 02/04/12 20:00, Bill Roberts wrote: >> Ah, sorry, misread your previous mail re stage 3 queries. >> >> No, the number of queries at this point doesn't seem to make any difference, >> as long as the PUT has finished. >> > > Great - and I have a theory I need to test out. > > (If it's a valid theory, this is the same root cause as Paul Gearon's > problems despite them looking different to me initially). > > Andy > >> >> On 2 Apr 2012, at 19:37, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >>> On 02/04/12 19:33, Bill Roberts wrote: >>>> Hi Andy >>>> On 2 Apr 2012, at 14:23, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Bill, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for the delay in replying. It was too sunny. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No problem! I am all for appreciating a bit of sunniness when the chance >>>> presents itself. >>>>> >>>>> Please add it to JIRA. >>>> >>>> Will do. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> There's nothing I can see that >>>>> >>>>> (how much RAM?) >>>> >>>> 16 GB on the server for the problems that I reported last week. 2GB on my >>>> Mac where this specific test was run (and a fair bit of that used by other >>>> software). >>>> >>>>> >>>>> big.ttl is the imd-2010-imd-score.ttl file? >>>>> >>>> I've tried it with a few different files (including that one) - same >>>> effect with each. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does it have to be 2 queries at stage 3? Does one have the same effect? >>>>> None? >>>> >>>> Just tested a bit more: with a single query during the PUT, it worked >>>> correctly 4 out of 5 times and failed once. With two queries during the >>>> PUT, the problem occurred in all tests (tried about 10 times with 3 >>>> different 'big' files). >>> >>> stage 3 is the queries after little the PUT - I'm guessing these make no >>> difference if little PUT has finished. >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks very much >>>> >>>> Bill >>>> >>> >> >
