ETA on Release? Den mandag den 26. juni 2017 kl. 18.13.07 UTC+2 skrev Stephen Connolly: > > On 26 June 2017 at 08:14, Joseph P <jose...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> This UI is a lot better! Looking forward to the massive upgrade! >> >> Just wondering with the refactoring will it be possible for PRs to >> rebuild when changes to target branch is notified? >> When the option for Merge PR with Target branch is selected. >> >> That would be AWESOME! >> > > So right now that would be a controversial feature... > > What I want to do is add the concept of interesting and non-interesting > revisions to SCM-API > > I feel that it is necessary to have that concept in order to enable > support for Tag discovery (because you certainly want old tags as > non-interesting, if not all tags as non-interesting) > > Then the idea would be that the Branch-API's multi-branch project would > not build non-interesting revisions by default. > > With the above changes then we could do things like: > > 1. Merge commits where only the target branch changes are non-interesting > (which is a win for the people who do not want build storms on indexing) > 2. Merge commits where the target branch changes are interesting (which is > what you want) > > With some of the other changes in SCM-API it would then be safe to add > multi-branch project triggering change requests when the target branch > changes because we'd have > https://github.com/jenkinsci/scm-api-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/jenkins/scm/api/mixin/ChangeRequestSCMHead.java#L57 > > and > https://github.com/jenkinsci/scm-api-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/jenkins/scm/api/mixin/ChangeRequestSCMHead2.java#L45 > > so we'd know that the checkout strategy is merge and hence if > https://github.com/jenkinsci/scm-api-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/jenkins/scm/api/mixin/ChangeRequestSCMRevision.java#L65 > > has changed then we should re-fetch the effective head revision... and if > it is interesting then we can rebuild. > > At least that is my current thinking... > > But right now there are two camps of people: > > - Those who want the build storm > - Those who do not want the build storm > > Until I can satisfy both camps we will have to live with the current > "build storm only on indexing" situation. > > >> >> >> Den fredag den 23. juni 2017 kl. 15.32.54 UTC+2 skrev Stephen Connolly: >>> >>> How do you find the new UI compared with the previous one? >>> >>> On 23 June 2017 at 14:18, Joseph P <jose...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Upgrade on "prod like" went smooth :) >>>> Could we move the question for behaviours closer to the behaviours text? >>>> >>>> >>>> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-6ZYEdujPA6I/WU0Ut447ZXI/AAAAAAAABro/MO4YEevB3rAPfGAWqoJnqkqruXW26SBFACLcBGAs/s1600/shot_170623_151622.png> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Den torsdag den 22. juni 2017 kl. 08.10.41 UTC+2 skrev Joseph P: >>>>> >>>>> I will try and get around to testing it today. >>>>> >>>>> Den onsdag den 21. juni 2017 kl. 20.30.03 UTC+2 skrev Stephen Connolly: >>>>>> >>>>>> How many people have been able to try this so far? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue 20 Jun 2017 at 14:52, Stephen Connolly < >>>>>> stephen.al...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> If you are chomping at the bit, here are all the binaries: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/47weboatdzus22w/AADNF_aBniOyEeQi9MvM82sMa?dl=0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SHA1 checksums: >>>>>>> d9c346ac8db497a35825c7dbbb934842a2bc429a branch-api.hpi >>>>>>> 16da429f09fb585fd1d744809ee22c8d612fb62c >>>>>>> cloudbees-bitbucket-branch-source.hpi >>>>>>> 234fa8eb88dad3241d620bb0116dd12fb9decbba git.hpi >>>>>>> a68be01144f3045f81a5cf3c0bc60ad12f39b643 github-branch-source.hpi >>>>>>> 92237097815b45260bb8b272caa9be9f92eb5085 mercurial.hpi >>>>>>> 04c321420b3752a8d8b3af89cae1bf5934607b1c scm-api.hpi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SHA256 checksums: >>>>>>> 858ce20992c3f179b850c512979999084b11fe7c4c173cf6d4d2e07bbfebf3e7 >>>>>>> branch-api.hpi >>>>>>> 8ebff7a3ec43df276d4b51d1e5bcb910bbe8eb4cd47a4be0e35f2f2ca1cd0e03 >>>>>>> cloudbees-bitbucket-branch-source.hpi >>>>>>> 46cbbf11395df4a085829094d5a36dee7328aeba00d33e34b44aa0dcf9898248 >>>>>>> git.hpi >>>>>>> 6495a60f1bf0733d807f412434c6c2e24b7bba53fd7ce348ca5319ef38571f20 >>>>>>> github-branch-source.hpi >>>>>>> 173d12042fe8582efdb52e740f4e939b9daa05f181c6aaff31824337d519a31c >>>>>>> mercurial.hpi >>>>>>> 9b58e9e6d13ce90a91b73f38142bf0977f244df9c52b948988f9d5bdc3785481 >>>>>>> scm-api.hpi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Stephen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 20 June 2017 at 14:29, Stephen Connolly <stephen.al...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK! Here we are... testing time! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These are the plugins that are being covered: (download links >>>>>>>> should be live in an hour or two) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> scm-api 2.2.0-alpha-1 >>>>>>>> https://updates.jenkins.io/download/plugins/scm-api/2.2.0-alpha-1/scm-api.hpi >>>>>>>> branch-api 2.0.11-alpha-1 >>>>>>>> https://updates.jenkins.io/download/plugins/branch-api/2.0.11-alpha-1/branch-api.hpi >>>>>>>> git 3.4.0-alpha-1 >>>>>>>> https://updates.jenkins.io/download/plugins/git/3.4.0-alpha-1/git.hpi >>>>>>>> mercurial 2.0-alpha-1 >>>>>>>> https://updates.jenkins.io/download/plugins/mercurial/2.0-alpha-1/mercurial.hpi >>>>>>>> github-branch-source 2.2.0-alpha-1 >>>>>>>> https://updates.jenkins.io/download/plugins/github-branch-source/2.2.0-alpha-1/github-branch-source.hpi >>>>>>>> cloudbees-bitbucket-branch-source 2.2.0-alpha-1 >>>>>>>> https://updates.jenkins.io/download/plugins/cloudbees-bitbucket-branch-source/2.2.0-alpha-1/cloudbees-bitbucket-branch-source.hpi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Recommended testing procedure: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. Set up a throw-away Jenkins running a version similar to your >>>>>>>> production environment *with the pre-upgrade versions of the >>>>>>>> plugins you are using*. >>>>>>>> 2. Set up ideally at least one organization folder and one >>>>>>>> standalone multibranch project building your source code - to a first >>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>> you do not care if the builds succeed or fail, only that the branches >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>> found. >>>>>>>> 3. Trigger a scan / index of your organization folders and >>>>>>>> standalone multibranch projects. >>>>>>>> 4. Wait for the queue to complete >>>>>>>> 5. Run the script in the system script console: >>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/stephenc/64ef58783b4438a126ad4e3f43062df1 >>>>>>>> and save the output to smoke-pre-upgrade.txt >>>>>>>> 6. Upgrade the relevant plugins, restart Jenkins. >>>>>>>> 7. Run the script in the system script console: >>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/stephenc/64ef58783b4438a126ad4e3f43062df1 >>>>>>>> and save the output to smoke-post-upgrade.txt >>>>>>>> 8. Trigger a scan / index of your organization folders and >>>>>>>> standalone multibranch projects. >>>>>>>> 9. Wait for the queue to complete >>>>>>>> 10. Run the script in the system script console: >>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/stephenc/64ef58783b4438a126ad4e3f43062df1 >>>>>>>> and save the output to smoke-post-rescan.txt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At this point, do a diff between smoke-pre-upgrade.txt and >>>>>>>> smoke-post-rescan.txt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are looking for three classes of difference: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> a. branch jobs that have been rebuilt for no reason (i.e. the >>>>>>>> revision is the same) >>>>>>>> b. branch jobs that have disappeared for no good reason (i.e. the >>>>>>>> branch is still present in the backing scm) >>>>>>>> c. branch jobs that have suddenly appeared for no good reason (i.e. >>>>>>>> the branch was there before but not found) [expecting some of these >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> BitBucket PRs from forks, but only after configuration updated, saved >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> another rescan performed] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My expectation is that nobody will have these kinds of issues. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also try out the new UI to see what you think. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please report back your testing results either way. Don't forget to >>>>>>>> report back your UI feedback too ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After doing that test in a throw-away Jenkins, you can *optionally* >>>>>>>> repeat the test on a *more* production*-like* (emphasis on being >>>>>>>> production-like not production) instance... but this is code that has >>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>> yet completed code review (hence -alpha-1 not -beta-1) so it is at >>>>>>>> your own >>>>>>>> risk. There are additional issues to be aware when using more >>>>>>>> production-like environment: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> a. You may have builds that were assuming branches were full >>>>>>>> clones, now the refspec is tightly reduced to minimize clone time. If >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> need a full clone you will need to add the "Advanced Clone" behaviour. >>>>>>>> b. Mercurial repositories on Bitbucket Cloud do not support merge >>>>>>>> commits for PR building (yet) >>>>>>>> c. Credential domains were not being correctly compared so as a >>>>>>>> result - if you are using credential domains to help sort credentials >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>> there may be cases where the credentials are now searched for in a >>>>>>>> different domain than you had them in, so your domains may need >>>>>>>> reconfiguration to have the credentials found by the multibranch >>>>>>>> project / >>>>>>>> org folder. >>>>>>>> d. The pipeline snippitizer is generating $class style for some of >>>>>>>> the GitHub and BitBucket specific behaviours, this is because my plan >>>>>>>> is to >>>>>>>> further consolidate the implementations and have a single shared >>>>>>>> implementation of each for these plugins, that way they can have a >>>>>>>> single >>>>>>>> @Symbol annotation... if that is too difficult then the @Symbol would >>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>> to be prefixed with gitHub / bitbucket respectively, e.g. >>>>>>>> gitHubBranches, >>>>>>>> bitbucketBranches for the discover branches behaviour. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Stephen >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 18 June 2017 at 15:53, Michael Kobit <mko...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I may be able to help with this as well. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017, 17:28 Dan Tran <dan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I will give it a spin too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Dan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 11:57:26 AM UTC-7, Kevin Burnett >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> we'd be down to try that, yes. thanks for making these changes >>>>>>>>>>> in a way that will benefit the product long-term! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> fingers are crossed that there's already a built-in way to >>>>>>>>>>> pretend like pull requests don't exist! you're already building the >>>>>>>>>>> branches; why also build the pull requests, eh? :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks! >>>>>>>>>>> kb >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 2:35:54 PM UTC-4, Mark Waite wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to be part of the beta test. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Waite >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:19 PM Stephen Connolly < >>>>>>>>>>>> stephen.al...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just a quick status update. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In final stages of this work now. Bobby is being a superstar >>>>>>>>>>>>> and reviewing my 13k LoC change on the Bitbucket branch source - >>>>>>>>>>>>> brings >>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of feature parity with GitHub and adds the configuration >>>>>>>>>>>>> ability of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the pure Git branch source >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am finalising the GitHub Branch Source changes... likely to >>>>>>>>>>>>> be another big PR >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Then there's a 5k LoC change in the Git plugin >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Plan is to try and get all merged next week and cut a beta >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll be looking for people to help test at that stage. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please respond if you think you can help (lots of bugs fixed >>>>>>>>>>>>> as a side effect of the refactoring - it makes things more easy >>>>>>>>>>>>> to test => >>>>>>>>>>>>> I found and fixed bugs) >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my phone >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CA%2BnPnMxfYrZphgYDXFD3i%2Bo_7eDn7mn2qVrzJz6wFaoVkNmc%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CA%2BnPnMxfYrZphgYDXFD3i%2Bo_7eDn7mn2qVrzJz6wFaoVkNmc%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to jenkinsci-use...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/5dd15ac2-b8a2-4ebd-bb4a-3bffa4815227%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/5dd15ac2-b8a2-4ebd-bb4a-3bffa4815227%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>> Groups "Jenkins Users" group. >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>> send an email to jenkinsci-use...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CALELY9GHbX4WuHdDKM8-bU1xR5voh-NsfHeQXNAxMjJpXkiwrw%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CALELY9GHbX4WuHdDKM8-bU1xR5voh-NsfHeQXNAxMjJpXkiwrw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sent from my phone >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/28dce0c5-4d1e-4a0c-a9a6-f5f2f703172d%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/28dce0c5-4d1e-4a0c-a9a6-f5f2f703172d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Jenkins Developers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/35b729b8-4484-48c8-8391-6f4ce4fcc59e%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/35b729b8-4484-48c8-8391-6f4ce4fcc59e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/80729acc-d370-4088-8c60-9875849436e4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
