Oleg & Fred,
Very good question. I am actually not sure myself, exactly what these
restrictions mean. I am going to run it by one of our lawyers and get back
to you. I will try and get more clarity...
Best Regards
Scott M
On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 10:00:32 AM UTC-4, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> FTR https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/pull/826 for CentOS.
>
> Regarding UBI, I have the same concern as Fred. We have no tools to
> enforce the Export limitations on DockerHub. I am also not sure that
> restricting specific countries according to US laws is compliant with how
> the Jenkins open-source project operates. IIRC we used to have contributors
> from the countries restricted by US.
>
> Best regards,
> Oleg
>
>
> On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 7:01:48 PM UTC+2, Fred Blaise wrote:
>>
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> What do you think of the export restrictions in the EULA? (some ref:
>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/15/740.17)
>>
>> Any chance you could confirm internally with Redhat that UBI is 100% fit
>> for Jenkins open-source?
>>
>> Thank you.
>> Best,
>> fred
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 15, 2019 at 11:14:40 PM UTC+2, Scott McCarty wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>> I saw this thread a while back, but couldn't respond until after we
>>> launched UBI publicly. UBI follows the RHEL lifecycle, but has the added
>>> bonus that 1. new versions come out before CentOS and 2. receives RHEL
>>> updates (exact same RPMS). You can build on think of it as CentOS+ when ran
>>> anywhere, with the added bonus that it can be run on RHEL/OpenShift and be
>>> fully supported by Red Hat. It's distributed under a different EULA than
>>> other Red Hat which does allow redistribution of Red Hat trademarks in the
>>> content set (YUM/RPMS, images, etc). Also, we will likely add packages in
>>> the future, but will never remove them. Feel free to ping me if you have
>>> any questions (smcc...@redhat.com) or this email...
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/introducing-red-hat-universal-base-image
>>> -
>>>
>>>
>>> https://access.redhat.com/containers/#/product/5c180b28bed8bd75a2c29a63
>>>
>>> Scott M (@fatherlinux)
>>>
>>> On Friday, May 10, 2019 at 4:09:56 AM UTC-4, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>>>>
>>>> FYI there is a pull request for CentOS image in Jenkins Docker packages
>>>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/pull/826
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 5:29:20 PM UTC+1, R Tyler Croy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> (replies inline)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Olblak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > But I am wondering, instead of going with Centos why not using this
>>>>> PPA <https://launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa> with
>>>>> ubuntu?
>>>>> > This would imply a smaller breaking change
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not believe that Jenkins should rely on any PPA (Personal Package
>>>>> Archive), they have a tendency of growing stale unlike mainstream
>>>>> official
>>>>> packages.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/rtyler
>>>>>
>>>>> GPG Key ID: 0F2298A980EE31ACCA0A7825E5C92681BEF6CEA2
>>>>>
>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/d20edbdf-b6a3-4463-931b-7fbacfb33c2e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
