That sounds good to me.  I like the idea of the transition from SPI to
CommunityBridge.

I think the Core Infrastructure Initiative is a good direction for the
Jenkins project to consider in any case.  I'd like to be involved in
efforts there.

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 5:35 AM Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am working on the Jenkins donations page <https://jenkins.io/donate/> update
> at the moment (INFRA-2396
> <https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/INFRA-2396>), and I would like to
> propose some changes there so that we can have a funding source once SPI
> retires the Jenkins donations as a part of our transition to CDF. Jenkins
> funding helps us to run outreach programs and to cover some infrastructure
> costs, and as a board member I think it is really important to keep it
> running and, ideally, to facilitate funding and using the money in the
> project.
>
> *TL:DR:* Let's use CommunityBridge <https://funding.communitybridge.org/> as
> a SPI replacement to raise funds. It is maintained by Linux Foundation, and
> it is recommended for all projects within LF or sub-foundations like CDF.
> Examples: CHAOSS <https://funding.communitybridge.org/projects/chaoss>,
> Manjaro <https://funding.communitybridge.org/projects/manjaro> or KiCAD
> <https://funding.communitybridge.org/projects/06d36004-70a3-4f1f-8ae3-d0b2dd98815d>
>
>
> *Background.* Jenkins project operates thanks to contributions and
> sponsorship (infra, meetups, swag, etc, etc.). Historically we did not have
> high cash flows in the project, we mostly spend money on infra and on
> outreach programs (swag, travel grants, Outreachy and Community Bridge in
> 2019). Sponsorship covered the most of our "big" expenses (e.g. Azure,
> meetup.com, contributor summits, etc.), but there is a tendency to
> formalize such donations through CDF. Currently sponsorship through CDF is
> a lengthy process not suitable for small donations, and it would be great
> to have a simple process so that we can raise money to facilitate the
> changes in the project.
>
> *Current state*
>
>    - https://jenkins.io/donate/ documents the donations policy.
>       - This page has not been updated for a while, working on it
>       - This page basically designates donations to be consumed for
>       Jenkins Infra,
>       - There is an explicit statement that "Your contribution is not
>       used for paying personnel.". Arguably, this is what we do for Outreachy 
> and
>       CommunityBridge though stipend for outreach projects != salary
>    - Jenkins uses SPI to accept donations. Soon SPI will no longer accept
>    donations to Jenkins due as a part of the transition to CDF. The exact date
>    is TBD, but the decision has been already made in Spring 2019 as
>    communicated by Tracy Miranda
>    - We also accept donations through ffis.de, but the status is unknown (
>    WEBSITE-703 <https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/WEBSITE-703> tracks
>    the investigation). It is also not clear whether they have Jenkins money on
>    their accounts and how to access them
>    - CommunityBridge Funding site
>    <https://funding.communitybridge.org/projects/jenkins> is enabled for
>    mentorship donations only as a part of Governance Meeting decisions in July
>    2019). We used it to dry-run the JCasC Dev Tools project
>    <https://jenkins.io/projects/jcasc/dev-tools/> this year, and it works
>    pretty well (except the SPI => LF transfer part which was the major
>    obstacle for the mentee payments).
>
>
> *Suggested changes*
>
>    - Update "Your contribution is not used for paying personnel " to be
>    explicit that the Jenkins project might use money to sponsor limited-term
>    work on the project: outreach initiatives, addressing mission-critical
>    topics (e.g. INFRA needs) or facilitating projects required for the Jenkins
>    future' (e.g. JCasC, Cloud Native Jenkins, etc.)
>       - All such projects will need to be approved by the Governance
>       meeting
>       - The payments should be limited to reasonable amounts so that it
>       is "facilitating contributions / mentorship" but not a fully-paid job. 
> E.g. GSoC
>       stipends
>       <https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/help/student-stipends> 
> could
>       be used as a reference
>    - Enable CommunityBridge-based sponsorship for all available
>    categories: Development, Marketing, Meetups, Bug Bounty, Travel and
>    Documentation. We update documentation to mark it as a default donations
>    way.
>       - It will enable organization payments and also small monthly
>       donations by individuals in the Patreon style. E.g. see CHAOSS
>       <https://funding.communitybridge.org/projects/chaoss>, Manjaro
>       <https://funding.communitybridge.org/projects/manjaro> or KiCAD
>       
> <https://funding.communitybridge.org/projects/06d36004-70a3-4f1f-8ae3-d0b2dd98815d>
>       - As a risk for this plan, Core Infrastructure Initiative
>       <https://www.coreinfrastructure.org/> certification is expected for
>       projects on Community Bridge in long term. I got clarification from 
> Linux
>       Foundation that it is not a blocker at the moment. See INFRA-2396
>       <https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/INFRA-2396> for the context
>       - CommunityBridge allows donations to be designated to particular
>       areas so that donors can decide what they sponsor
>       - In the future I would suggest to allow targeted sponsoring of big
>       changes as outreach projects. It is way of the scope for this thread, 
> so I
>       will create a follow-up once I am ready
>    - Mark SPI-based donations as deprecated. Even if they continue to
>    work, reimbursements from SPI and transferring money from SPI to Linux
>    Foundation is a lengthy process due to the SPI activist-driven model. SPI
>    helped the project A LOT, but the payments experience should improve since
>    Linux Foundation has full-time employees responsible for payments
>    - Investigate the status of ffis.de and update the documentation
>    accordingly. Mark as deprecated in the case of doubt
>
> This proposal does not include raising visibility of the donations page.
> But we can definitely do it once the new flow is set up and battle-tested.
>
> If there is a consensus and approval at the next governance meeting, I
> will proceed by setting up a PoC and creating a JEP draft for funding.
>
> Thanks for your time,
> Oleg Nenashev
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPfivLDPkPHSCPao3Nw1SqtykPhTKpaqMnA8ryT31VZVUziXzw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPfivLDPkPHSCPao3Nw1SqtykPhTKpaqMnA8ryT31VZVUziXzw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
Thanks!
Mark Waite

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAO49JtF5%3Dy7NkPbncA_W_Q0h-uFAyKnbvKhYYG_E0Zgt%2Bp4u5w%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to