Thanks to everyone who reviewed it! Just a reminder, today we will be voting for approving the pull request as a new Code of Conduct version
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020, 12:27 Oleg Nenashev <o.v.nenas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Pull request with Code of conduct is ready for update: > https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/pull/3477 > > Best regards, > Oleg > > On Friday, June 19, 2020 at 2:12:07 PM UTC+2, Oleg Nenashev wrote: >> >> UPD: At the Jun 17 Governance meeting we discussed the Code of Conduct >> update and agreed to go forward with updating to Contributor Covenant 2.0 >> (6 votes in favor, no against/abstains). We have NOT approved the new code >> of Conduct yet. >> >> Next steps: >> >> - Oleg - to propose a pull request to jenkins.io with a Code of >> Conduct update >> - Contributor Covenant Update >> - CDF as a second level of escalation >> - Aligning enforcement rules, etc. >> - Formally voting for a suggested code of conduct PR at the next >> governance meeting (July 1st) >> >> Meeting notes: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11Nr8QpqYgBiZjORplL_3Zkwys2qK1vEvK-NYyYa4rzg/edit#bookmark=id.yr5dfh4k94u6 >> Recording of the discussion: https://youtu.be/3g0GKvVHfgI?t=501 >> >> Best regards, >> Oleg >> >> On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 5:51:07 PM UTC+2, Oleg Nenashev wrote: >>> >>> Update w.r.t the code of conduct update options: >>> >>> - We got a response from Dan Lorenc (CDF TOC chair) about going with >>> 2.0:* "I think from the TOC perspective, we're fine with anything >>> above Contributor Covenant 1.3. We'd prefer projects upgrade over time, >>> but >>> don't want to be prescriptive about when or how." * >>> https://lists.cd.foundation/g/cdf-toc/message/442. I interpret is as >>> that we could go with 2.0 >>> - I submitted a pull request to Contributor Covenant which >>> summarizes the changes between 1.4 and 2.0: >>> https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant/pull/800 . >>> It is pending review, but it provides some insights >>> >>> Based on feedback, I have added 2 votes to the Governance meeting: >>> >>> - Vote: Update from Contributor Covenant 1.3 to 1.4 >>> - Vote: Update from Contributor Covenant 1.3 to 2.0 >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Oleg >>> >>> On Saturday, June 13, 2020 at 8:49:58 PM UTC+2, Oleg Nenashev wrote: >>>> >>>> HiJeff, >>>> >>>> I agree that Contributor Covenant 2.0 is generally better, especially >>>> for a large community like Jenkins. This version basically includes >>>> statements of the Community Covenant which covers wider areas. I am fine >>>> with exploring this option more. >>>> >>>> I have contacted the Contributor Covenant author in the GitHub Issue >>>> referenced above. Maybe we could have an official changelog for this >>>> version. Once ready I will submit a question to CDF TOC about using this >>>> version, it is important to have explicit sign-off so that we comply with >>>> Graduated Project requirements. >>>> >>>> Let's discuss both 1.4 and 2.0 options at the next governance meeting. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Oleg >>>> >>>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/u0T56f9MSZY/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e75bd80d-9e4c-485e-9470-6ff677e067a4o%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e75bd80d-9e4c-485e-9470-6ff677e067a4o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPfivLD1q7FrhJXjk_B7dEHt2sYQKshLt82jHgT7U6Orgxn4tA%40mail.gmail.com.
