Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.235

[Daniel Beck]

> On 29. Jul 2020, at 13:59, Oleg Nenashev <o.v.nenas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 2.250 is a fancy number, so why not?

As I previously explained, too similar to 2.150 which was also an LTS baseline. 
Since there's no other notable difference to 2.249, I would prefer less 
confusing bug reports over having a nice looking number.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/374FBAD1-9229-4EC1-B333-1B1BF1B299B5%40beckweb.net.