https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-65605 for tracking purposes.

KK has been pinged to see if someone can get access, (even if just to 
approve a transfer request).

/James

On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 11:05:58 AM UTC+1 timja...@gmail.com wrote:

> The bridge method injector project looks abandoned? We may need to fork it 
> to release a fix 
>
> On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 11:00, jn...@cloudbees.com <jn...@cloudbees.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> There are 2 regressions that I know of currently in 2.288,  one is a 
>> blocker and the other possibly so.
>>
>> 1. the `WithBridgeMethods` annotation no longer works and so we would 
>> break compatibility with plugins using bridge methods from core  PR to fix 
>> the injector is 
>> https://github.com/infradna/bridge-method-injector/pull/25 and this will 
>> need a release and a Jenkins PR and then backporting. (will create a Jira 
>> soon)
>>
>> 2. the HTML form submission has broken quite a few tests (could be 
>> HTMLUnit bug, or other but there are a number of plugins now with failing 
>> tests when bumping to this core) 
>> -> https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-65585  , 
>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5405#issuecomment-836265920 
>> and https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5479
>>
>>
>> /James
>>
>> On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 3:55:22 PM UTC+1 Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>>
>>> Then let's postpone it until .2 at least
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 4:44 PM Basil Crow <m...@basilcrow.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:35 AM Oleg Nenashev <o.v.ne...@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > I wonder whether we should also create a Remoting 4.8 backport this 
>>>> time: https://github.com/jenkinsci/remoting/releases/tag/remoting-4.8
>>>> > There are 2 bugfixes which seem important though we could also just 
>>>> embed 4.8 into the LTS line. THere is one performance RFE and one minor 
>>>> feature added, so just backporting the version looks safe enough
>>>>
>>>> #449 is off-by-default and anyway only applies to the Swarm client
>>>> rather than the Jenkins controller. The other changes, while not
>>>> regression fixes, seem safe to me. I don't feel strongly either way.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>>> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/TPQum9wHFVg/unsubscribe
>>>> .
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>>> jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFwNDjqR22pncxWPsmBq3biGDZZWtHBoN2Bm%2B1qfbv%3DXY1WhEQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c1032e1c-b60b-4780-8d9e-a4fd116f9c36n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c1032e1c-b60b-4780-8d9e-a4fd116f9c36n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/548b7ee5-8e71-4144-86e0-6265035e85adn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to