Rudolph,
that is certainly another way of doing it. I already use Mixed Jess/Java
(some complex numerical analysis in user functions) and so I could have a three
layer cake Java - Jess - Java. Again, though, it just seems wrong to add layers
of complexity when a minor modification to Jess (Ernest: that's called wry
British humour btw) would do everything I need, and more.
So, I suppose you might say my original request for modules was motivated
somewhat by aesthetics and not by purely practical concerns (I have it working
now .. just not 'prettily'). Of course I have to wonder what percentage of CLIPs
systems that might want to move to Jess (especially with Ernest's recent
turbocharging - way to go, Ernest!!) use modules ?
Tnx
Alanl
Rudolph George-P27574 wrote:
> If the system naturally partitions itself into sequential phases,
> then I'd suggest a change of strategy. View it as a procedure whose
> steps are potentially complex (requiring jess, etc.)
> Would you consider rewriting it as some over-arching procedure that
> keeps track of the steps and interacts with jess where it makes sense to do
> the complex reasoning?
-------------------------------------------------------------
| Alan Littleford | Networks and Software |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (650)-964-4313 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
list. List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
