> -1 pending a vote and commitment to do this effort as a team from all > voting developers. > The PSML services are now working very well in both Database and File > System implementation. > I am strongly -1 on changing this just to support an optional feature.
If you decide to go ahead with this change, would it be possible to get a CVS tag on the current stable codeset? Things seem pretty good from what I've seen and I would like to be able to move ahead building on top of the current code without waiting for more features, if that is at all possible. > They are two different entities and IMO require different semantics. > I personally don't see the need to check security during content > aggregation and prefer that this check is made during customization > (placing portlet instances on the page). If security is only checked during customization, what happens if the administrator revokes a permission/role/group later? If a change is made that takes the user's right to a portlet away later, won't checking security only at customization miss this? Thanks, Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
