AFAIK , richfaces doesn't(wasn't) work(ing) with myfaces/tomahawk. We are using 1.2 RI for that. There is also a known issue in the fileupload component working with the portletbridge.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:12 AM, David Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Before I try them and end up pulling my hair out in frustration, am I > likely to run into the same kind of issues that the tomahawk extension > filter has? > > Youssef Mohammed wrote: > >> we dumped ICEfaces for richfaces that along with portletbridge work just >> fine in portals. >> The main issue we had then with ICEfaces was the comet/pushlet thing that >> 1- You have to define new servlet that operate outside our JSF/Facelets >> one. >> >> 2- doesn't scale well >> 3- A hell of headache for firewalls that usually closed their longed lived >> connections. >> Having said that, the richfaces is used under JBoss Portal and we haven't >> tried it under Jetspeed yet. >> >> Regards, >> Youssef >> >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Brad Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> From what I can tell, its been done. I however, am currently working on >>> it >>> myself and have had some difficulty getting the environment configuration >>> right. I've recently developed a portlet for a client using IceFaces >>> that >>> they run in Liferay, and from first hand experience can say that it is a >>> very suitable framework for portlet development. If I make any headway >>> on >>> getting my test portlet into Jetspeed 2 I'll be sure to let you know. >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:52 AM, David Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> Hi everyone, in my never ending quest to improve my user interface >>>> I've >>>> stumbled accross ICEfaces, a set of AJAX based jsf components. Now I've >>>> >>>> >>> done >>> >>> >>>> some web searches about integrating ICEfaces with Jetspeed, but mostly >>>> >>>> >>> the >>> >>> >>>> results are old and somewhat ambiguous and I was wondering if, before I >>>> >>>> >>> go >>> >>> >>>> too deep down the rabbit hole, anyone had tried this recently. >>>> >>>> Possible issues I've been seeing (but again, I'm unsure if these are >>>> >>>> >>> "real" >>> >>> >>>> problems still): >>>> >>>> Integration into portlet lifecycle / conflicts with standard jsf bridges >>>> jars. >>>> Possible conflicts between ICEfaces themes and portlet decorators. >>>> Problems on pages that incorporate both ICEfaces and jsf portlets in the >>>> same aggregation (unclear if this is more of a problem if they come from >>>> >>>> >>> the >>> >>> >>>> same .war or seperate .wars, judging by the possible issue with bridges >>>> >>>> >>> I'm >>> >>> >>>> guessing the latter). >>>> >>>> >>>> Any info about potential problems, links to decent descriptions of >>>> >>>> >>> portlet >>> >>> >>>> configs etc... would be useful. >>>> >>>> David Dyer >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Brad Gardner >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1676 - Release >> Date: 17/09/2008 9:33 AM >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Regards, Youssef
