At 07:36 PM 2/18/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>2.Fragments and/or Full Documents
> (This affects portlet container performance and ease of
> implementation - and thus development costs)
>
> Alternatives:
>
> a) only document fragments concatenatable without post-processing
> -> high-performance
> -> low effort implementation of portlet container
> -> requires to strip off tags from tool-generated
> document templates once in advance
> -> container can easily concatenate portlet output
> -> container can be agnostic to fragments' internal
> structures
>
> b) document fragments and full documents
> -> high performance possible if programmers use fragments
> -> higher effort for implementation of portlet containers
> -> container must strip off tags from full documents
> generated by some portlets at run-time and be able to
> handle framents.
> -> container must be aware of document structure and know
> what parts have to be stripped off for each particular
> markup type
>
> c) only full documents that require post processing
> -> lower performance
> -> higher effort for implementation of portlet containers
> -> container must strip off tags from documents generated
> by portlets at run-time
> -> container must be aware of document structure and know
> what parts have to be stripped off for each particular
> markup type
Suggestion: Add a configuration tag to the portlet definition
which specifies whether or not the portlet will produce partial
or full content.
Suggestion: Create portlet wrappers for full content stripping
so the containers won't have to deal with this stuff.
Steve
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/jetspeed@list.working-dogs.com/>
List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
