Yes, that's correct. That's what the websocket-core renamed packages are now. (org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.*) So we can prevent the package space overlap concerns in OSGi.
-- Joakim Erdfelt <joa...@intalio.com> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Greg Wilkins <gr...@intalio.com> wrote: > The packages for websocket are now a bit verbose. Server and client > are ok, but core produces: > > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.annotations > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.api > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.api.* > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.driver > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.extensions > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.extensions.* > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.io > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.io.* > > > Can't this just be: > > > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.annotations > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.api > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.api.* > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.driver > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.extensions > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.extensions.* > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.io > org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.io.* > > > So long as no other module/jar contains any of these packages we are good. > > > > > > > > -- > Greg Wilkins <gr...@intalio.com> > http://www.webtide.com > Developer advice and support from the Jetty & CometD experts. > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > jetty-users@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >
_______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list jetty-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
