Hello,

I have run into problems with our JFFNMS installation.
A few weeks back I upgraded the machine running JFFNMS from Ubuntu 4.10 to 
5.04, and ever after I cannot get performance graphs - but only for traffic on 
physical interfaces! All other graphs work just fine (packets, utilization etc.)

When I try to view a graph, all I get is:
rrd_graph() ERROR: can't parse ''  
The RRDTool files for Interface ID 1899 (from Host ID 56), has not been created 
by the Poller Process yet  

I have tried to start with fresh RRD files, but that did not help.

When I try to poll one of the interfaces from the command line, I get:
------------------------------
# php poller2.php 0 1899
12:13:53  :  H   0 : Poller Start : 17 Items.
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  10 : verify_interface_number(): 25 -> 
verify_interface_number(): interfacenumber not changed (time P: 1524.81 | B: 
8.36)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  15 : 
cisco_snmp_ping_start:cisco_snmp_ping_start(): -1 -> buffer(): 1 (time P: 6.16 
| B: 0.2)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  20 : snmp_counter:input(.1.3...25): 
1692420944 -> buffer(): 2 (time P: 28.25 | B: 0.2)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  25 : snmp_counter:inpackets(.1.3...25): 
11681591 -> buffer(): 3 (time P: 29.25 | B: 0.21)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  30 : snmp_counter:output(.1.3...25): 
2504328494 -> buffer(): 4 (time P: 36.49 | B: 0.22)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  35 : snmp_counter:outpackets(.1.3...25): 
10545509 -> buffer(): 5 (time P: 31.06 | B: 0.21)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  40 : snmp_counter:outputerrors(.1.3...25): 0 
-> buffer(): 6 (time P: 25.49 | B: 0.21)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  45 : snmp_counter:inputerrors(.1.3...25): 0 
-> buffer(): 7 (time P: 29.23 | B: 0.2)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  46 : snmp_counter:drops(.1.3...25): 0 -> 
buffer(): 8 (time P: 33.79 | B: 0.2)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  47 : db:bandwidthin(band..tes): 250000000 -> 
buffer(): 9 (time P: 0.13 | B: 0.2)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  48 : db:bandwidthout(band..tes): 250000000 
-> buffer(): 10 (time P: 0.1 | B: 0.18)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  50 : cisco_snmp_ping_wait(): -1 -> 
no_backend(): 0 (time P: 0.21 | B: 0.07)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  55 : cisco_snmp_ping_get_pl:packetloss(): 0 
-> buffer(): 11 (time P: 0.19 | B: 0.21)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  60 : cisco_snmp_ping_get_rtt:rtt(): 0 -> 
buffer(): 12 (time P: 0.19 | B: 0.18)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  65 : cisco_snmp_ping_end(): -1 -> 
no_backend(): 0 (time P: 0.18 | B: 0.07)
12:13:55  :  H  56 :  I 1899 :  P  80 : no_poller(): 0 -> rrd(*): 
input:1692420944 - output:2504328494 - inputerrors:0 - outputerrors:0 - rtt:0 - 
packetloss:0 - inpackets:11681591 - outpackets:10545509 - drops:0 - 
bandwidthin:250000000 - bandwidthout:250000000 (time P: 0.09 | B: 32.35)
12:13:56  :  H     :  I 1899 :  P LPD : last_poll_date(): 1129976035 -> 
db(last_poll_date): 1 (time P: 0.09 | B: 295.09)
12:13:56  :  H   0 : Poller End, Total Time: 2173 msec.
------------------------------ 
When I try to do an rrddump of the interface rrd files with
rrdtool dump *1899-<0-11>.* 
I get data on all of the rrd's - except on -9. There are entries for all poll 
times, but their value is only NaN.

My installation is running on PostgreSQL and is an 0.8.0 upgraded to 0.8.1 and 
again to 0.8.2.

Hope someone can help me resolve this problem, as it really is detracting value 
from an otherwise great utility!


Best regards,

Allan Jensen
Systemadministrator, TDC Call Center Europe A/S 

TDC Totalløsninger A/S
Driftssupportafdelingen
Ellegårdvej 23A
6400 Sønderborg
Denmark
Tlf. +45 74 18 18 83
Mobil +45 21 44 42 37
Fax +45 74 18 18 19
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web tdc.dk 




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
jffnms-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users

Reply via email to