Hiya,
Here is what DSTAT says:
Disk is not too bad by the looks of it...
----total-cpu-usage---- -disk/total -net/total- ---paging-- ---system--
usr sys idl wai hiq siq|_read write|_recv _send|__in_ _out_|_int_ _csw_
76 13 8 3 0 0| 43k 324k| 0 0 | 0 2.7B|1137 775
88 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4718B 4947B| 0 0 |1071 661
87 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3941B 4378B| 0 0 |1062 572
87 13 0 0 0 0| 0 720k|4483B 4943B| 0 0 |1166 640
88 12 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4768B 5214B| 0 0 |1069 593
88 12 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4240B 4655B| 0 0 |1065 535
87 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4363B 4757B| 0 0 |1065 550
89 11 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4281B 4753B| 0 0 |1064 534
80 13 0 7 0 1| 0 2984k|4547B 4868B| 0 0 |1544 649
68 17 0 16 0 0| 0 1300k|3227B 3369B| 0 0 |1338 455
88 12 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4526B 4956B| 0 0 |1065 524
89 11 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4345B 4998B| 0 0 |1066 554
87 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |5180B 5489B| 0 0 |1072 633
86 14 0 1 0 0| 0 2060k|4239B 4708B| 0 0 |1434 548
81 14 0 6 0 0| 0 0 |3600B 4000B| 0 0 |1145 306
86 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3961B 4453B| 0 0 |1062 328
89 12 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4149B 4356B| 0 0 |1058 328
86 15 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4344B 4723B| 0 0 |1062 326
88 13 0 0 0 0| 0 296k|4207B 4643B| 0 0 |1089 338
88 12 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4387B 4736B| 0 0 |1106 309
87 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3985B 4235B| 0 0 |1062 346
87 14 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4067B 4533B| 0 0 |1060 327
88 12 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4562B 4821B| 0 0 |1058 335
86 14 0 0 0 0| 0 280k|4055B 4624B| 0 0 |1089 348
88 11 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4362B 4622B| 0 0 |1058 325
87 14 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4232B 4630B| 0 0 |1058 339
87 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4341B 4816B| 0 0 |1056 331
89 12 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4263B 4717B| 0 0 |1061 317
87 13 0 0 0 0| 0 688k|4239B 5048B| 0 0 |1202 326
85 14 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3379B 3848B| 0 0 |1061 335
87 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3602B 3567B| 0 0 |1056 338
89 12 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4045B 4463B| 0 0 |1061 354
86 15 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3553B 3951B| 0 0 |1053 396
86 14 0 0 0 0| 0 632k|3119B 3443B| 0 0 |1167 1427
87 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3485B 3863B| 0 0 |1053 1054
88 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3486B 3861B| 0 0 |1057 309
86 14 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3649B 3969B| 0 0 |1056 340
86 14 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3842B 4141B| 0 0 |1059 331
86 14 0 0 0 0| 0 948k|3851B 4330B| 0 0 |1176 327
86 14 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |4175B 3888B| 0 0 |1067 336
87 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3624B 3951B| 0 0 |1056 324
86 14 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3228B 3571B| 0 0 |1057 331
86 14 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |3934B 4335B| 0 0 |1059 305
82 17 1 0 0 0| 0 228k|3226B 3569B| 0 0 |1077 302
79 21 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |2261B 2593B| 0 0 |1037 433
89 11 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |2758B 3079B| 0 0 |1049 2061
88 13 0 0 0 0| 0 0 |2853B 3246B| 0 0 |1050 1007
86 14 1 0 0 0| 0 0 |3595B 3774B| 0 0 |1063 333
86 14 0 0 0 0| 0 1036k|3472B 3705B| 0 0 |1198 469
Javier Szyszlican wrote:
Are you using poller2?
Are the hosts you are monitoring slow?
Use 'dstat' to verify your disk I/O to see if you have a bottle neck
there.
Javier
Leigh Porter wrote:
Slackware, 2.6 kernel, P4 2.8Ghz with Hyperthreading, 1Gb ram, fast
SCSI UW320
disks in a RAID array, 41 Hosts, 1531 interfaces
Load almost always at load average: 5.14, 4.96, 4.81
So what am I doing wrong? Why is my load avg so high and why do I get
lots of gaps in graphs
(presumably due to the poller not having time to complete a poll
every 5 mins) ?
I was considering moving to a new Duel 2.8Ghz Zeon box with 4Gb ram
and a supafast
UW320 RAID0 array. But should I need to? The figures I have seen here
make me believe I
do not..
--
Leigh Porter
Meyers, Michael wrote:
95 Hosts, 624 Interfaces, max 40.98%, average 22.96%, last 22.50%
The load is pretty much constant at around 22-23%
Windows Server 2003
Processor: 1.2Ghz x 2
Total physical memory: 1.25GB
Thanks,
-Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Carr
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 10:40 PM
To: Craig Small; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [jffnms-users] Sizing of servers
Doh!
I'm running FC3 and was eyeballing the CPU %.
Over the last week, the 15 minute load average was 1.0 with a max of
5.2.
I'm rebuilding the box to use FC4 and we'll see if that makes a
difference.
We're also about to start putting a good number of these machines out
(on both this type of machine and one with a 2.4 ghz proc / 1.5 gb of
ram / SATA drives) and I'll get back with info on those.
Thanks,
Tim Carr
Buchanan Associates
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Small
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 8:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] Sizing of servers
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:18:29PM -0600, Tim Carr wrote:
Hosts: 55
Interfaces: 920
What OS? I'm guessing some sort of windows with load in a %.
If you don't want to say, that's ok too.
- Craig
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
jffnms-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
jffnms-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
