On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:14:33PM +0500, Adnan Hassan wrote: > YOUR REPLY:I don't know why you would get an alert for this. > > My Point is: I have added sendmail and cups exp services in jffnms monitor > and it should show me the alerts when the services are down with in 2 to 3 > minutes. That makes more sense. You were talking about the memory graphs and I could not see why the memory graphs would trigger an alert if sendmail stops.
Ironically enough, if sendmail stops then the alerts, which probably use sendmail cannot get sent. I believe the process pollers there is a parameter where you can alarm on the minimum or maximum number of processes with that name. > > And i'm motoring all SWAP,real and memory buffer in my monitoring. > Please explain for better solution Alarm of a set-point for the swap used, either a percentage or absolute value. The real memory used value is not useful for alarming (unless you have no swap at all which in that case you got bigger problems). - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au http://www.debian.org/ Debian GNU/Linux, software should be Free ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
