On 8/2/05, Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 16:41 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On 7/29/05, Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think there's something about sparc64 that jfs isn't handling
> > > correctly.  I've run a lot on ppc64, so I don't know what the difference
> > > would be.
> > >
> >
> > Just wondering if you had any ideas about this behavior.  I'm willing
> > to run any tests or try any patches.  For reference it seems to be a
> > sparc64 thing since we have the exact same set up on AMD64 and it
> > works flawlessly (7 TB JFS volume).
> 
> I have a theory that jfs's use of 24-bit structures may be causing
> alignment problems not seen on other architectures.  I have made these
> patches to both the kernel and utilities to get rid of bit-fields from
> our structures.  Can you give them a try?  Even if it doesn't fix the
> problem, I kind of like it from a cleanup point of view.

I'll give them a try and get back to you.  Thanks for looking into this.

Alex

> --
> David Kleikamp
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> 
> 
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to