On 8/2/05, Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 10:43 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On 8/2/05, Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have a theory that jfs's use of 24-bit structures may be causing > > > alignment problems not seen on other architectures. I have made these > > > patches to both the kernel and utilities to get rid of bit-fields from > > > our structures. Can you give them a try? Even if it doesn't fix the > > > problem, I kind of like it from a cleanup point of view. > > > > I'll give them a try and get back to you. Thanks for looking into this. > > The gdb output you sent me tells me something else is amiss. I'll let > you know what I find out. >
Sounds good. I'll hold off on the patches then. Alex > Thanks, > Shaggy > -- > David Kleikamp > IBM Linux Technology Center > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
