On Thursday 17 October 2002 16:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > logdump => jfs_logdump > > logredo => jfs_logredo > > should be merged into fsck, imho. > just make it fsck -l or so and document that).
Which one(s)? logredo? This one is already built into fsck. The only nice thing about a stand-alone version is that you can replay the log without the possibility of running the whole fsck. This is good for debugging, but it could probably be accomplished with a new fsck flag that says replay log only. logdump? It probably makes more sense to be merged into jfs_debugfs, if it is merged at all. jfs_debugfs, jfs_logdump, and jfs_fscklog are only useful as debugging tools and I don't think the code should be in the fsck.jfs binary. > > xpeek => jfs_debug > > jfs_debugfs? Fine with me. -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
