On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:53:11PM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Thursday 17 October 2002 16:45, Scott Russell wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:41:12PM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > > On Thursday 17 October 2002 16:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > I know :) That's why I think it should be a "only replay log" > > > > option to fsck instead of a standalone util. > > > > > > Okay. I agree. I was just making sure I understood. -l conflicts > > > with an e2fsck flag though. Maybe -O (opposite of -o). > > > > -0 and -O look very similar on a tty. Avoid -0 or -O IMHO. > > Good point. Both -p and -n together (or -a and -n)?
If it's an 'obscure' option then the way to handle is to use a long opt only I think. fsck.jfs --something. That way there is no confusion and a user won't 'accidentally' invoke it. just my 0.2 -- Scott Russell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Linux Technology Center, System Admin, RHCE. Dial 877-735-8200 then ask for 919-543-9289 (TTY) _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
