I'm so ashamed. If I attentively read man, I can see, that I may end information with
-v parametr. I can save the time.
So: I run fsck on test partiton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# jfs_fsck -fv /dev/hdg6
jfs_fsck version 1.1.7, 22-Jul-2004
processing started: 9/17/2004 22.47.48
The current device is: /dev/hdg6
Open(...READ/WRITE EXCLUSIVE...) returned rc = 0
Primary superblock is valid.
The type of file system for the device is JFS.
Block size in bytes: 4096
Filesystem size in blocks: 29304560
**Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log
LOGREDO: Log already redone!
logredo returned rc = 0
**Phase 1 - Check Blocks, Files/Directories, and Directory Entries
File system object MF1 has invalid descriptor (C).
Filesystem is clean.
All observed inconsistencies have been repaired.
Filesystem has been marked clean.
**** Filesystem was modified. ****
processing terminated: 9/17/2004 22:47:49 with return code: 0 exit code: 8.
> On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 03:09, Petr Humlicek wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# jfs_fsck -f /dev/hdg6
> > jfs_fsck version 1.1.7, 22-Jul-2004
> > processing started: 9/15/2004 22.35.23
> > The current device is: /dev/hdg6
> > Block size in bytes: 4096
> > Filesystem size in blocks: 29304560
> > **Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log
> > **Phase 1 - Check Blocks, Files/Directories, and Directory Entries
> > Filesystem is clean.
>
> jfs_fsck is acting funny. It seems to be aborting somewhere in Phase 1
> without an error. This isn't supposed to happen. Normally, fsck
> continues on to phases 2-8.
>
> Can you run jfs_fsck -fv against the partition? This may tell us
> something. If not, I may have to send you a debug patch to try and
> determine where fsck is bailing out.
>
> > Ok, have I any chance to save data, or I may format disc, and thing
> > about RAID, or another way for safe backup?
>
> I think we still have a chance to save it, if I can figure out what's
> broken in fsck.
>
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion