So this just runs in the background? It’s more or less automatic, once 
installed? Thanks, Keith

From: Gerald Levy [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 11:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Unchecky - A boon for keeping unwanted extras from installing


I have had Unchecky installed on my PC for a few months, and it seems to work 
and is accessible with JAWS.  A few times when I attempted to upgrade CCleaner 
to the latest version, I was notified by Unchecky during the installation 
process that it had detected and unchecked a box for installing Google Chrome.

Gerald



From: Brian Vogel<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 12:34 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Unchecky - A boon for keeping unwanted extras from installing


Here's another thing I'll recommend, though I don't know whether it plays well 
with JAWS or not, I haven't had any time to experiment with it.

Any of us who download free software, even from reputable sites such as Adobe, 
etc., are finding that most vendors are now engaging in the loathsome (to me, 
anyway) practice of bundling other, often completely unassociated, software 
with their installation packages.  People have gotten into the habit of 
responding in the affirmative to most prompts and check boxes during installs 
and this is causing a lot of people to end up with a lot of toolbars, programs, 
etc., that they never had any desire to have.

Unchecky<http://unchecky.com> (direct setup download link 
here<http://unchecky.com/files/unchecky_setup.exe>) is a package that "keeps 
watch" over dialog boxes as they pop up during installation monitoring for 
specific words and phrases associated with asking to install things other than 
what you're actually running the setup for.   It's not perfect, but it's very 
good, and it has the added advantage of presenting a button when it finds this 
stuff that lets you decline it just by pressing that button rather than having 
to deal with the checkboxes that are typically involved.

If anyone decides to give this a go please let me know how it behaves with 
JAWS.  It seems that most companies are getting much better about following 
coding conventions that make things far more accessibility friendly, but one 
never knows until the stuff is put to the test.

Brian

Reply via email to