Hi there, Jeff,

I have stated in two messages recently that I think this problem may be
related to the fact that Word 6 uses different script files than Word 8.

I didn't get past the install stage with Office 97.  When I started I found
I just couldn't read the choices on the CD.  I had been able to read these
perfectly on my husband's machine at 800 X 600.  As I had no sighted help
available and wanted to leave myself with a workable version of MS Office,
I decided to leave well alone at that stage.


--
Carol Pearson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



At 15:27 01/01/99 -0800, Jeff Senge wrote:
>What specifically is not working right with JFW 3.2 and Word 8 at 640 by
>480?  I have found some work-arounds for some of the problems I have seen
>with this combo but need to know what specific problems you are having to
>respond appropriately.
>
>Jeff
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carol Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Friday, January 01, 1999 2:44 PM
>Subject: Re: Colors and resolutions
>
>
>>Hi there,
>>
>>I'm just writing publicly, although I expressed this in another message and
>>may have told you also privately, so that everyone is sure.
>>
>>I wrote in this thread that Word 8 wasn't working for me in 640 X 480.
>>Following this, George wrote and said that it worked for him, so I thought
>>about it.  My conclusion is that it may just not be a colours or resolution
>>issue but may be due to the fact that Word 6 uses slightly different slript
>>files.  I asked for feedback on that.  Until we have that matter sorted, I
>>don't want to be known as shooting off that Word 8 doesn't work in this
>>resolution, rather that it hasn't worked for me in trying to install as
>>things stand.
>>
>>
>>--
>>Carol Pearson
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>At 14:11 01/01/99 -0500, P Tusing wrote:
>>>>>>
>>Hi.
>>Thanks first to the excellent individual who wrote me privately re: colors
>>and resolutions. I wish I could post that message,but invite that person to
>>do so.The point was so well made.
>>    As new programs require the higher resolutions. there is a period of
>>time  where our software must adapt so we can use them. Also, regarding
>>resolutions, there have been 2 postings stating that Word 8 does not work
>>for them currently at a certain resolution.
>>    I have an S3Trio video card; Word 8 works for me in 640 by 480, but
>>there areproblems with that resolution in other situations.
>>    Also regarding colors, there has been a posting saying that Quicken 99
>>does not work in 256 colors.What do you do when Quicken 98 sells out and
>>you have to use the 99 version?
>>    I had to find out the hard way that I had  to use 640 by 480 to get
>>anything out of IE 4.01 and had to experiment with colors. As a new user,
>>it took weeks of trial and error, resetting and failing and retrying again.
>>    I would summarize those who might be affected by the resolution and
>>color issue with JAWS in to a few groups listed below.
>> 1. An unspecified number of users of Word 8 and Quicken 99.
>> 2. New users of IE 4.01 who haven't figured it out yet--(Yes, new users
>>join this list ever day).
>>3. In a small business environment where sighted people also use the
>>computer and tend to dislike 640 by 480 resolution.
>>4. In the home user environment where sighted family members gripe about 6
>>by 4 in terms of  their reading--particularly in games.
>>5. Large print users who use JAWS. The resolution 640 by 480 plays havoc
>>with large print programs.Eight people have written the list about that
>>since November 98.Five others have said same to me-who are not on  this
>>list.The 6 by 4 influences the magnifying effect.
>>6. General market for JAWS + large print... More JAWS users means more
>>money for product development..There are speech programs that work easily
>>in  800 by 600 resolution (which would solve the above issues).But JAWS is
>>excellent but "seems to"  favor the 640 by 480 resolution..
>>
>>The exchange of info on helpful viedo cards and any other positive
>>solutions would be greatly appreciated.Best wishes for 1999!
>>
>><<<<
>>
>>
>>
>>-
>>To unsubscribe, see the home page
>>http://yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au/~nallan/jfw
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, see the home page
>http://yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au/~nallan/jfw
>

-
To unsubscribe, see the home page
http://yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au/~nallan/jfw

Reply via email to