Bill,
I would say that since JFW uses other methods, for the most part, to
interact with programs such as Word and Internet Explorer, there shouldn't
be any reason to upgrade Active Accesibility until HJ makes more use of it.
Gary, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:02 AM 1/14/99 -0500, you wrote:
>well when i first attempted to use update i hit download and my system
crashed.
>well glad to report that the first 4 patches i installed solve that problem.
>next the program sucks when it comes to reconizeing what has already been
>updated.
>i got the 2000 update cd rom and installed it before useing windows update
>and it failed to reconize that it had been installed.
>by the way this feature plus scan reg w has convinced me that win 98 is
>the only way to go for beginners.
>its update feature is as easy as symantec, the makers of ghost and norton
>utilities and wind fax.
>now here is my question, i did not install
>
>1.2 of active accessability
>
>reason i did not is because in the past hj said not to install active
>accessability, that if jfw needed it it would be shipped with the screen
>reader.
>so is this advice still valid, or should i go ahead and install active
>accessability?
>
>bill cameron
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au/~nallan/jfw
>
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au/~nallan/jfw
