HI all,
For those who are interested. >X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 16 17:30:59 1999
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unverified)
>Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 19:31:51 -0500
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Henter-Joyce Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Ticket No. 27274 FW: Y2K
>
>According to the official statement listed below, JAWS 3.0 and later products
>are Y2K compliant, but apparently, JAWS 2.0 is not. In light of this, I
>suggest that you upgrade your copy of JAWS 2.0, to a compliant version, to
>avoid any possible problems.
>
>January 20, 1998
>
>
>To Whom It May Concern;
>
>
>Henter-Joyce, Inc. software products JAWS for Windows 3.0 95/NT (JFW) and MAGic
>95 and NT have been tested and are not effected by the year 2000.
>
>Any prior products that are found incompatible with year 2000 may be up graded
>to new compliant products.
>
>This is to certify that all current Henter-Joyce, Inc. software is year 2000
>compliant.
>
>Sincerely yours,
>
>
>Gerald J. Bowman
>General Manager
>At 11:05 AM 2/16/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: The Coe Family [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Monday, February 15, 1999 7:30 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Y2K
>>
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I am interexted as to whether or not the following JFW products are Y2k
>>compliant?
>>
>>JFW 2.0
>>
>>JFW 3.209 and .31
>>
>>My register No. 1755.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>C. Coe
>
>
>
>
M.C./C.C.
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au/~nallan/jfw