Hello all,
Hello all,
Here is my response to Hj's response on Y2K compliance. >Date: Wed, 17 Feb
1999 09:57:19
>To: "Henter-Joyce Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Charles Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Ticket No. 27274 FW: Y2K
>
>HI,
>
>Does this mean that the computer on which I have JFW 2.0 installed and
working with windows 3.1 will not work after Dec. 31, 19999? Does the later
version 3.0 and above work with windows 3.1? If so which version and what
is the cost?
>
>I purchsed this version approx. 3 years ago thinking it would last and work
fine after the year 2000, now you tell me that JFW 2.0 could be a problem
once the Y2K arrives.
>
>The later version such as the version I just purchased for my new computer,
JFW 3.209 will not work on my 486 machine, because of JFW requirements.
>
>I did not intend to replace my 486 and Operating System just because JFW
2.0 will not work properly after the year 2000.
>
>There are probably many individuals who are using JFW 2.0 and cannot
afford to go out and purchase a new computer so that it can work with the
later versions of JFW. I think that HJ should make some sort of
accomadation for these individuals including my self, who are using, and
still need to use JFW 2.0.
>
>C. Coe At 07:31 PM 2/16/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>According to the official statement listed below, JAWS 3.0 and later products
>>are Y2K compliant, but apparently, JAWS 2.0 is not. In light of this, I
>>suggest that you upgrade your copy of JAWS 2.0, to a compliant version, to
>>avoid any possible problems.
>>
>>January 20, 1998
>>
>>
>>To Whom It May Concern;
>>
>>
>>Henter-Joyce, Inc. software products JAWS for Windows 3.0 95/NT (JFW) and
MAGic
>>95 and NT have been tested and are not effected by the year 2000.
>>
>>Any prior products that are found incompatible with year 2000 may be up graded
>>to new compliant products.
>>
>>This is to certify that all current Henter-Joyce, Inc. software is year 2000
>>compliant.
>>
>>Sincerely yours,
>>
>>
>>Gerald J. Bowman
>>General Manager
>>At 11:05 AM 2/16/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: The Coe Family [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Monday, February 15, 1999 7:30 PM
>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Subject: Y2K
>>>
>>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>I am interexted as to whether or not the following JFW products are Y2k
>>>compliant?
>>>
>>>JFW 2.0
>>>
>>>JFW 3.209 and .31
>>>
>>>My register No. 1755.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>C. Coe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
M.C./C.C.
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au/~nallan/jfw
