the difference I have been told and have found is that the standard version
of jfw that is for win 95 / 98, uses evmove. where as the nt versions use
the HJAUTH command., evmove exists on the NT versions of jfw but doesnt want
to work when it's run.
this is what I have found and I use both, what I would like to know is why
do HJ not stick to a standard for both versions?
simon.
At 08:04 6/03/99 -0600, you wrote:
>Scott,
>You might try running "hjauth" from windows. I have found--and this is just
>a guess--that some authorizations respond well to evmove while others
>(presumably newer ones) respond to hjauth.
>Just a thought.
>Bob
>Roses are red,
>Violets are blue,
>I'm schizofrenic,
>And I am too.
>Bob and Bob Wiley
>-----Original Message-----
>From: scott rutkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Friday, March 05, 1999 9:50 PM
>Subject: jfw authorization disk problem
>
>
>>Hi there.
>>Just wondered if I could have some assistance?
>>I tried today to use evmove in native dos to move a key from my c drive to
>>the authorization disk.
>>I am running windows 98 and I tried this in dos mode not in a dos box.
>>I logged on to drive a and type
>>evmove c: a:
>>Evmove started to run but then the hole pc just locked up.
>>I tried this several times.
>>It worked fine last month.
>>The only changes I have made to my system in that month are a new
>>soundblaster live card and a cd rom drive.
>>I was in native dos so none of those drivers would be loaded.
>>I am running jfw 3.2.31.
>>any info on things I could try would be very much appreciated.
>>Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>>-
>>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
