I recently had to get an updated authorization disk, and, this 1 uses
hjauth. I beleive that HJ is now using a different copy protection
method than they were before. The older 1 uses evmove and the newer 1
uses hjauth, therefore, there are 2 different authorization key types
floating around. I really don't care which version they use, but I do
have a problem with hjauth. hjauth only works under windows which is
ok, however, when you use it, it don't talk. If anyone has gotten it
to talk properly when executing commands, let me know how!
On Sun, 07 Mar 1999 23:02:36 +1300, Simon F wrote:
>the difference I have been told and have found is that the standard version
>of jfw that is for win 95 / 98, uses evmove. where as the nt versions use
>the HJAUTH command., evmove exists on the NT versions of jfw but doesnt want
>to work when it's run.
>
>this is what I have found and I use both, what I would like to know is why
>do HJ not stick to a standard for both versions?
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
