Is Henter-Joyce the new name for Yahweh? As I have just posted in
answer to Walt Smith, the copyright statute and case law are out there
in the public domain. Go and read them for yourself, and please quit
dragging this into the muck of stupid and futile name-calling? Go read
Teresa Cochran's posting. See ye!
>From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: jfw authorization disk
>Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 22:05:14 -0500
>
>At 04:14 PM 3/22/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>Simon: That remark was out of place, in very bad taste and downright
>>offensive. If your view is correct, then blind people are scum for
>>asserting their right, say, to access under the Americans with
>>Disabilities Act (ADA). Get real, idiot!
>>
>>
>>>From: Simon F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Subject: Re: jfw authorization disk
>>>Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 07:43:15 +1200
>>>
>>>if someone was to sue HJ for this then in my book they would be
nothing
>>>lower than snail scum.
>>>
>>>and need a good kick in the butt.
>>>
>>>simon.At 10:45 22/03/99 EST, you wrote:
>>>>Hey, guys:
>>>>
>>>>I promise you, this is my swan song. Fact is, there is something
you
>>>>could do, but I admit it's drastic. Based on the information
>>contained
>>>>in the Web article I posted yesterday, you could actually sue HJ, or
>>any
>>>>other vendor, for preempting a right established both in the
copyright
>>>>statute and in case law...the right to archive. It seems to me, as
I
>>>>think it through, that if you have the right to archive, that
preempts
>>>>and interdicts any right of a vendor to prevent archiving through
copy
>>>>protection. I don't know whether that specific question has ever
been
>>>>litigated, but the outcome sure would be interesting. In summary,
the
>>>>point is that your right to archive and the vendor's right to
>>>>copy-protect cannot coexist; so in the kind of suit I would suggest
>>>>(which, incidentally, should be class action), the courts would be
>>>>forced to decid once and for all which right takes precedence. I
>>would
>>>>gladly put forth that we must live with that decision, whichever way
>>it
>>>>might go.
>>>>
>>>>Goodby!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>From: "Hutson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>Subject: Re: jfw authorization disk
>>>>>Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 20:44:07 -0600
>>>>>
>>>>>Come on guys. There's nothing we can do to change HJ's opinion of
the
>>>>>authorization disks & we can sit & complain till we are blue in the
>>>>face
>>>>>which I think we are. go to the chatroom that has been set up for
>>this
>>>>kind
>>>>>of fussing & lets clear the list. I think theback logs are full of
>>this
>>>>kind
>>>>>of discussion & don't think it has helped one bit.
>>>>>Server name is:
>>>>>irc.scscorp.net
>>>>>Room is:
>>>>>#JAWS
>>>>>If no one is there encourage others to jin youat certain times &
>>build
>>>>this
>>>>>room up.
>>>>>Rhonda Hutson
>>>>>
>>>>>-
>>>>>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>>>-
>>>>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Simon Fogarty
>>>Dunedin, NZ
>>>
>>>Hm ph: ++64-03-4771633
>>>WK ph: ++64-025-2230355
>>>
>>>Email:
>>>hm : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>sch: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>bus: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>-
>>>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>>
>>
>>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>-
>>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
