I would be interested in hearing what if anything has occurred as well with the ATI AGP Rage Pro video card. I also have such a card and have been using the old drivers as suggested by HJ when acquiring 3.2 very recently. I continue to have some display problems on account of it. I have not yet installed 3.3. But surely will be happy if the 32 bit drivers are now compatible. Also, can someone explain this-- I understand the recommended pixel settings to be 800 x 600 or there abouts, but when I change mine to that instead of the 640 x 1040 that it was, then a big chunk of the display is gone beyond the screen for sighted peers. What gives? Another thing... sometimes, JFW reads a few lines and then like reads the same lines again, and then maybe skips down further along in the document missing some of the text in between. I suspect still related to the video card problem. Rik [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Ron McEwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 8:53 AM Subject: JFW 3.3 and ATI cards Hi all, I noticed that when installing JFW 3.3 that DR. JAWS indicated that I had a ATI AGP rage pro card and it needed no modifications. I am currently running the 16 bit drivers. Will JFW 3.3 support the 32 bit dirvers for this card? Ron - Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net - Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
