I would also be interested in the below information. I have a ATI Rage LT
Pro card on my system. Have been reduced to using an older 16 bit
driver. Because of this, my family is no longer able to enjoy the DVD
capability of my system. I would love to know what HJ is doing about this
"OSM16.dll" file that is giving so many AGP video cards fits.
At 02:50 PM 4/15/99 -0600, you wrote:
>I would be interested in hearing what if anything has occurred as well
>with the ATI AGP Rage Pro video card. I also have such a card
>and have been using the old drivers as suggested by HJ when acquiring 3.2
>very recently.
>I continue to have some display problems on account of it. I have not yet
>installed 3.3.
>But surely will be happy if the 32 bit drivers are now compatible.
>
>
>Also, can someone explain this-- I understand the recommended pixel settings
>to be 800 x 600 or there abouts, but when I change mine to that instead of
>the 640 x 1040 that it was, then a big chunk of the display is gone beyond
>the screen for sighted peers. What gives?
>
>Another thing... sometimes, JFW reads a few lines and then like reads the
>same lines again, and then maybe skips down further along in the document
>missing some of the text in between. I suspect still related to the video
>card problem.
>
>
>
>Rik
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ron McEwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 8:53 AM
>Subject: JFW 3.3 and ATI cards
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>I noticed that when installing JFW 3.3 that DR. JAWS indicated that I had a
>ATI AGP rage pro card and it needed no modifications.
>
>I am currently running the 16 bit drivers. Will JFW 3.3 support the 32 bit
>dirvers for this card?
>
>
>Ron
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
