Sure Keith, I would quit using microsoft too, if I could, but...
Actually, I wholeheartedly agree with Geoff. It seems like a lousy policy
to me--kind of like preaching to the choir--but, like it or not, that is the
way things are done.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, April 18, 1999 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: jfw3.3 and the 40 minute limit
>{chuckling{ Yeah, I might stop using JFW if there was a REAL choice.
>Unfortunately, I don't think there is a really practical alternative to JFW
>and wonder if there ever will be considering the cost of development and
the
>relatively limited market. I think Microsoft has basically painted us into
>an HJ corner by favoring one developer over any other.
>
>Keith
>
>>minute time limit gives the user ample opportunity to realize the
>>greatness of the update. However, I would say that the 40 minute time
>>limit would only tend to infuriate me! I would probably be in the
>>midst of doing something important when it timed out. Hence I might
>>totally stop using the product altogether!
>>
>
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
