The speaking of cursor shape changes and text formatting attributes are a
real plus to me. Knowing the changes in the cursor shape makes exploring
new application screens easier by easily identifying where edit fields
begin and end. Formatting information helps greatly when viewing or editing
documents where formatting or text attributes add significant meaning to
the task. I'd get the upgrade for those two reasons alone.
At 06:45 AM 5/6/99 +0000, you wrote:
>OK folks, I've been sitting here, copying all the mail on the 3.3 beta
>and final release. I've seen pros and cons galore, problems and
>solutions, and some problems without solutions. I am currently not
>entitled to an upgrade--i.e., my SMA has expired--so I can't install
>it even if I wanted to. My question is, given what you know about
>3.3, is it worth going for the next SMA, or should I pass this one by
>and wait for the next release and continue on with 3.2? You should
>also know that, by and large, 3.2 has been working excellently for me
>on the two Windows 95 platforms on which it is installed, and also the
>Windows 98 machine I sometimes use it on. My primary uses for JFW are
>Internet software such as Agent, Internet Explorer and Netscape, music
>software such as Cakewalk, Winamp, CD-Copy, .MP3 Producer Pro,
>RealAudio (all products, including the new jukebox system), etc. In
>my ofice, I use Lotus Notes Version 4.6, Kermit for Windows 95
>V1.1.17, Reflections (sometimes), the Reflections FTP client, and
>occasionally the Reflections-X product for getting into XWindows-based
>systems which works--wel--kinda-sorta. Knowing all of that, is it
>worth going for this SMA? Any and all responses, flames, rotten eggs,
>graciously accepted publicly or privately.
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
##===<>
Julio C. Perez, Access Technology Consultant
<>===##
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
